Premises Liability vs. Slip and Fall: What’s the Difference In North Carolina?
Premises Liability vs. Slip and Fall: What’s the Difference In North Carolina?
When an injury occurs on someone else’s property, legal terms like “premises liability” and “slip and fall” often come up. While they are related, they are not the same. Understanding the difference is important if you’ve been hurt in North Carolina. At Jordan Legal Services, we can provide legal assistance to the Raleigh public.
What Is Premises Liability?
Premises liability is a broad area of law that holds property owners and managers responsible for keeping their property reasonably safe. If unsafe conditions cause harm—such as poor lighting, broken stairs, or lack of security—the injured person may have a claim.
What Is a Slip and Fall?
A slip and fall is a specific type of premises liability claim. It occurs when someone is injured after slipping, tripping, or falling due to hazards like wet floors, uneven sidewalks, or cluttered walkways. While it is one of the most common premises liability cases, it is only one example.
Why the Difference Matters
- Scope: Premises liability covers a wide range of hazards, while slip and fall is one category.
- Proof: Both require showing that the property owner knew or should have known about the hazard and failed to address it.
- Compensation: Victims may seek damages for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering in either case.
Taking Action in North Carolina
If you are injured on another person’s property in North Carolina, the key question is whether the property owner acted reasonably to prevent harm. Slip and falls are common, but other dangerous conditions also fall under premises liability. Speaking with an attorney can help you understand your rights and the best way to pursue compensation.
At Jordan Legal Services, we assist the Raleigh community with claims involving unsafe property conditions.



